Who in Review: The Massacre Of St. Bartholomew's Eve
As my Doctor Who Real Time Marathon posts are rapidly catching up with my viewing 40 years on from transmission, I've been thinking about what I can do to expand my Blogs beyond my original remit. I'm not just a Doctor Who fan (in fact it's actually only my second favourite Sci Fi series) so there's the possibility of starting posts about the likes of Farscape, The X-Files, Defiance, Babylon 5, Star Trek, etc.
However, I want to stick to Doctor Who for the time being so I
thought I'd take the opportunity to share my thoughts on my favourite
stories for each Doctor so far. I know that there's a lot of this out there - for example, Brendan Jones produces videos on YouTube which appraise episodes, stories and seasons brilliantly - but I've always found my thoughts on various stories tend to be at odds with the majority of fandom, and whilst my DWRTM blog is a journal of my thoughts on individual episodes in order directly after watching them, they're somewhat limited, and put to paper directly after watching an episode so don't feature a great deal of analysis or depth beyond my immediate reaction to what I've just seen. And whilst this has had an affect on how I view a lot of the stories, they don't necessarily represent what I feel overall about a story, nor how much I like or dislike them when viewed outside my Marathon. For example, Robot is by far the worst story I've watched so far (up to the point I'm at publishing my Blog - Spoilers) but I don't hate the story as much as I did when viewed in 2014/15 and certainly didn't hate it as much before that point. It's not a story I'd put on very often, but it's a fun little runaround and inoffensive enough.
Needless-to-say, I'm not going to start with Robot. A few years ago I wrote articles for a fan page which no longer exists, so I thought this would be a good place to start. Some of the articles reviewed my favourite stories, so I figured it's time to drag them out of the cupboard and give them a dusting down and maybe some minor editing. I'm starting with the Original Doctor, obviously, who also
happens to be my favourite, and my favourite story from his era which
for me is...
The
Massacre Of St. Bartholomew's Eve
Firstly,
Season 3 is my favourite full series of Doctor Who. It's one of the
most chaotic, with so much going on behind the scenes which has an
impact on what was shown; it has a ridiculous number of Companions
travel with the Doctor - 6 in one season (7 if you count Sara
Kingdom!) and an incredible range of stories. The first half of the
season is incredibly dark but mixed with some very sophisticated
comedy, while the second half becomes more family-friendly with a
much lighter atmosphere (this is due to the show changing Production
teams very rapidly after Verity Lambert's departure - John Wiles and
Donald Tosh's famously short run as Producer and Script Editor
respectively giving way to Innes Lloyd and Gerry Davis' very
different take on the show).
Following
Galaxy 4, Verity's last Production credit on Mission To The Unknown
saw an upward swing in the drama which would continue to great effect
under Wiles and Tosh. The Myth Makers' Trojan escapades conclude with
a shockingly dark siege which leads directly into the epic Daleks'
Master Plan. This leviathan of a story lasted longer than one current
series of the show, to put it into perspective, and featured the very
first Christmas Special halfway through. It was also the first to
kill off a companion (or companions, if you count Sara Kingdom) and
as the Doctor and Steven leave the Time-ravaged wastes of Kembel we
reach the peak of Season 3 - The Massacre Of St. Bartholomew's Eve.
After
the events of the previous week, with the conclusion of such an epic
story, we start off War Of God with a rather simple idea of the
Doctor and Steven arriving in 16th Century Paris where, the Doctor
realises, lives a 'strange brotherhood of apothecaries' whose number
include (the entirely fictitious) Charles Preslin, a man who he'd
very much like to meet. We already know the Doctor is a fan of
historical France, so to take him there and have a light-hearted romp
after the darkness of the last few months seems a perfect remedy. But
what's so wonderful about The Massacre... is that this is exactly
what it doesn't do!
The
first episode sets up the Doctor's plan - Steven sitting it out in a
pub and the meeting with Preslin - but in the background the script is
sewing the seeds of the real plot; the St Bartholomew's Day massacre, an
historical event that even the most bookish schoolboy or girl would
likely be largely unaware of at the time (and even less likely
today). In the tavern in which the Doctor leaves Steven are a group
of Hugenots (French Protestants) discussing the religious unrest of the time
and subtly informing us of what's to come. It's a tavern visited by
both the aide of the Abbot of Amboise (a zealous Catholic) and
terrified servant Anne Chaplet. By the end of the episode, the
Hugenots have learnt of a plot to repeat the massacre of Wassy a
decade earlier (overheard by Anne) and the audience has seen that the
Abbot looks exactly like the Doctor... or is he actually the Doctor
in disguise?
That
latter conundrum is one of the story's highlights. On the Doctor's
previous visit to France (transmitted less than 18 months earlier)
the Doctor had indeed disguised himself as a government official in
order to access places he'd otherwise be denied. Whatever he
discusses with Preslin, the audience isn't party to, likewise where
the Doctor has gone by the end of the first episode (only that a boy
led him there safely on Preslin's instructions). You're therefore
unsure as to whether this is the Doctor or a doppelgänger
(unless you're already
familiar with the plot). The audience in 1966 would certainly have
been unsure for at the very least the first three weeks. It also
shows how good an actor Hartnell actually was, the Abbot being
remarkably different than the characterisation of the Doctor.
Another
remarkable aspect of The Massacre... is that it is very much Steven's
story. He takes centre stage, investigating, acting and reacting to
the situation he finds himself in. Completely in the dark regarding
the history of the time, he is the perfect character by which the
audience learns about the historical events - as he learns about
them, so do we. This fulfils the educational side of the programme's
original remit so much better than almost every other historical
story - everyone knows about the fall of the Aztec civilisation, the
burning of Rome, the fall of Troy (at least to some extent) but this
is taking an obscure piece of History and being informative whilst
entertaining. With the others, we know the outcome; with The
Massacre... we don't. Not only this, but the way in which Steven
learns about what's going on is also believable. Left in a tavern
frequented by Hugenots, once the Doctor has departed it's entirely
understandable that he befriends those there, witnesses the
surreptitious actions of those spying on the Hugenots and is
implicated himself. It's also entirely fitting that, upon overhearing
talk of a repeat of Wassy, Anne, the daughter of a Hugenot
slaughtered there a decade earlier, should flee and seek sanctuary in
a public place where she would find other Hugenots. And it both fits
and develops Steven's character when he insists his new friends take
care of her.
Another
interesting aspect of this story is the fact that each episode covers
a day leading up to the massacre. The Doctor and Steven arrive on
August 20th 1572 and leave as the massacre begins at dawn on the
24th. Each episode ends at night and starts again the following
morning. It's an interesting format which adds to the feeling that
something is being counted down to.
Perhaps
the most striking thing about The Massacre Of St. Bartholomew's Eve
is its conclusion. The coldness of Catherine de Medici as she
discusses the slaughter of thousands of Hugenots at the mercy of a
Catholic mob is shocking enough, but also implies that Anne, who the
Doctor has sent back to her Aunt's saying she'll be safe there, will
be anything but:
Marshall Tavannes: "Madame, if you rouse the
mob the innocent will perish with the guilty."
Catherine de
Medici: "Innocent? Heresy can have no innocents. France will
breathe a purer air after tomorrow... (and having ensured Prince
Henri of Navarre, a royal Protestant, escapes the slaughter) ...If
one Hugenot life escapes me tomorrow, we may both regret this act of
mercy".
It's entirely appropriate, then, that Steven vents his
horror and anger in the following TARDIS scene upon learning that his
new friends were all slaughtered, and that Anne (who the Doctor
barely recalls) was probably amongst them. His departure from the
TARDIS is one of the show's most beautifully written and emotionally
charged. The Doctor's subsequent eulogy is even more heart-rending as
he remembers his previous companions, left alone for the first time
in the series, and contemplates returning to his own planet only to
conclude that he can't. It's arguably the greatest scene in the show
up to that point, perhaps even since, and you wonder what the
audience at the time made of what they were watching. It all feels
like the end of an era (which, behind the scenes, it technically
was), a season finale but on an unprecedented low.
Until
Dodo arrives. The introduction of the young lass from Yorkshire (at
least, for now) lightens the mood, gives a reason for Steven's return
(warning the Doctor of two Policemen approaching the TARDIS,
doubtless for the same reason Dodo ran in) and allows the Doctor to
mollify Steven's anger over leaving Anne by suggesting that Dodo is
her descendant. It has more a feel of the episodes to come, but is a
welcome respite from the doom-laden episodes of the previous months
and allows the story at least a suggested happy ending. I,
personally, don't for a minute believe Dorothea Chaplet was descended
from Anne, but given that the TARDIS has stated herself that she
always takes the Doctor to where he's most needed, it's possible she
followed Anne's timeline to Wimbledon Common in 1966 so that her
(surprisingly open-minded) great-great-great-whatever-granddaughter
could wander in.
At
the start, I stated that Season 3 is my favourite series of Doctor
Who. The Massacre Of St. Bartholomew's Eve, for the reasons above and
more, is the highlight of that season and is, without a doubt, my
favourite story in the show's long history. Should the videotapes
ever be recovered, I doubt that will change. Despite being rewritten
by Donald Tosh from John Lucarotti's original scripts (or possible
because of this) it's the programme's finest example of an Historical
adventure; dramatic, interesting, informative and emotionally
charged, brilliantly acted and, judging from the few remaining
photographs, exhibiting some gorgeous production values.
I wouldn't say it was my favourite story but it's certainly very good. If you've never read the novelisation, it's eye-opening for just how different the original version was - and, to be honest, how much of an improvement the final version was, at least for television. It's also a unique story for being possibly the most purely historical of an of them, due to the Doctor being absent for so much of it and there being so little mention of the TARDIS and other sci-fi elements. In its way it's more of a play-for-today set-up that just happens to involve Doctor Who than the other way round.
ReplyDeleteI got hold of the novelisation and read it following your comments on my DWRTM post on the serial and, yes, it is very different and not remotely as dramatic or striking. Not to say that it isn't a great story, but it feels more of a traditional runaround than what we eventually got, and what we got sets itself very much apart from other Historicals. The recent episode 'Demons Of The Punjab' reminded me a lot of 'The Massacre...' and is my favourite of Jodie Whittaker's episodes so far (only just beating 'Rosa') largely because it tackles an area of history which very few people in the West are familiar with and uses the narrative as a form of education whilst still being incredibly entertaining and dramatic. I think it would take a lot to knock this story from the top of my list of the greatest Doctor Who serials. The audio had me mesmerised when I first bought it in 1999 and that enthusiasm and captivation hasn't worn away. It's the story I listen to the most and one which taps all my interests and ticks all the right boxes in what I want from a Doctor Who story (the novel 'The Witch Hunters' does a similar job in Doctor Who writing).
DeleteThe Witch Hunters was great (also because I was very familiar with The Crucible, which we had to read and analyse in-depth at school). I also liked Demons of the Punjab, but unlike The Massacre, I think it was let down by some rather wooden performances.
Delete